PAWUIC logo
Sponsored by PAWUIC

Prescott Area Wildland/Urban
Interface Commission

 

 

Regional Alert Info for Yavapai County

When there is vital, urgent or emergency public information in the Prescott, AZ, Metro Area and the rest of Yavapai County, you will find it on this website. Local government agencies will post alerts as quickly as possible on such events as wildfires, evacuations, prescribed burns, police emergencies, weather-induced road closures, water or gas main breaks and other notices of key importance to the public.
May 9, 2008

Last posted by Yavapai Co. Emergency Management on 5/6/08 at 3:10 p.m.



PRESCOTT NATIONAL FOREST ENTERING INTO STAGE I RESTRICTIONS




NEWS ADVISORY, MAY 5th - STAGE I FIRE RESTRICTIONS - Prescott National Forest beginning Wednesday, May 14, at 8:00 a.m. Forest managers have determined that key trigger points have been reached to warrant taking these restrictive actions. These include increased forest visitor use, abandoned campfires, high winds and rising temperatures.

The following fire restrictions will be in effect for the entire Prescott National Forest:

  • Campfires, charcoal grills, and stove fires (wood, charcoal, and coal burning) are prohibited on all National Forest lands, roads, and trails; except within developed recreation sites where grills and campfire rings are provided.
  • Pressurized liquid or gas stoves, lanterns and heaters meeting safety specifications are allowed.
  • Smoking is prohibited except within enclosed vehicles, buildings, or developed recreation sites where the area is cleared of all flammable material.
  • Campfires are not allowed at the designated dispersed sites within the Prescott Basin. Metal posts identify designated dispersed sites with a number.

    Campfire and smoking restrictions will remain in effect until forest officials determine that conditions have changed sufficiently to reduce the risk of human-caused wildfire. Violation of these prohibitions is punishable by a fine of not more than $5,000, imprisonment of not more than 6 months, or both. The public is reminded that fireworks are always prohibited on all national forest lands.

    For current information on fire restrictions, closures or wildfires on the Prescott National Forest, call 928-777-5799. For further information about fire restrictions on public lands in Arizona and New Mexico, call toll free 1-877-864-6985 or visit http://gacc.nifc.gov/swcc/



    NEWS ADVISORY, APRIL 21st- FOREST HEALTH STATE AND PRIVATE LANDS 2007 - ARIZONA - Defoliating insects were easily the most visible biological agents affecting the health of our forests in 2007. The drought conditions we have been experiencing may be a factor in the spread of some of these insects.

    First up was a dramatic increase in the population of pinyon needle scale in the Payson area in March. These defoliating insects were first detected in 1986 at the south end of town on a few small pinyons. An estimated 900 acres were infested in southeast Payson in 2007. The insect can become a chronic problem once it becomes well established.

    This chronic condition is best seen in the Prescott area where the insect has spread over thousands of acres in the last 30-50 years. Pinyon needle scale can be found from Prescott Country Club to the Prescott Basin, & to Williamson Valley all the way up to Hootenanny Holler. Two areas where heavy populations of these insects hatched in spring include, the Thumb Butte area in the Prescott Basin & Granite Oaks in Williamson Valley. Chronic defoliation by these insects has already killed many pinyons growing on drier rocky outcrops, south & west facing slopes, & transitional zones between pinyon-juniper and grassland vegetation types. They are being replaced by junipers & chaparral species.

    In late September, yet another site infested with pinyon needle scale was detected just north of Payson. A population of these insects was found in the northwest corner of Beaver Valley Estates. An estimated 24 acres are infested in the subdivision, but the population appears to extend into the adjacent Tonto National Forest.

    Even more dramatic was the detection in late June of a very large population of pine sawfly caterpillars, defoliating ponderosa pines along Highway 260 just east of Overgaard, stretching all the way to Pinedale – a distance of about 16 miles! An estimated 1000 acres were defoliated by this insect. Many of the trees defoliated by the sawflies were the survivors of the “Rodeo-Chediski Fire” in 2002 & may not survive a second year of defoliation. Especially, ponderosa pines damaged by the fire & stressed by drought. Smaller pines may be the most susceptible. However, few cocoons of these insects were collected in August in this area, and may indicate a dramatic decrease in the sawfly population due to natural causes. In late June, a patch of dead sawfly caterpillars was located underneath a ponderosa pine growing along Highway 260. They may have been victims of the cold snap on June 6th. These insects are known to cause spectacular defoliation for a year or two and then return to endemic levels.

    The other defoliating insect that made a splash in 2007 was the fall webworm. This insect is normally found at the lower elevations where cottonwoods & walnuts are abundant. Heavily infested cottonwoods were detected in the Camp Verde area in September with small trees thoroughly enveloped in the webbing produced by this caterpillar. On walnuts, Gila County seems to be a favorite location for the presence of this insect. Previous increases in populations of this insect in Gila County occurred in 1984, 1992-1993 and 1998-2000. Although Arizona walnut is the most common host, other shade, fruit, and ornamental trees are also attractive to these caterpillars.

    Prior to 1999 fall webworm had not been detected above the Mogollon Rim. In 2007, the webworm was found scattered from Forest Lakes to Heber-Overgaard to Show Low to Vernon. In addition, two new hosts for this insect were recorded above the Rim – Blueberry Elder and Siberian Elm. The increase in the distribution of this insect may be related to mild winters. In addition, the possibility exists that climate change may also be a factor in increasing the spread of this insect in Arizona.

    Temperature extremes were also a factor in 2007 with the very cold temperatures experienced in mid-January. Plants not native to the area were widely damaged by the cold temperatures in the Village of Oak Creek and Sedona. Eucalyptus, oleanders, palms and photinias were some examples noted. In addition, apparently even some native sugar sumacs growing along drainages were damaged by the cold. The cold snap experienced on June 6th also caused very noticeable damage to the new growth of ornamental spruces in and around the Flagstaff area. Damage to the new growth of Douglas-firs caused by the cold snap was also visible in the Summerhaven area of the Catalina Mountains in July.

    Juniper mortality precipitated by drought has been noted in the State since at least 1996. In 2007, scattered juniper mortality was visible in the west Sedona area and at the juncture of I-17 & the Sedona exit. In addition, juniper mortality continues to be noted north and west of Show Low. Secondary activity by juniper beetles has been reported in this area in the past. Scattered juniper mortality was also noted in other parts of the state. However, this mortality is mainly due to the unhealthy conditions of our woodlands caused by the lack of historical fires. Fires used to burn over large areas about every 10-30 years through dead, dry grass in late summer and fall thinning out the junipers. The introduction of livestock removed most of the grasses that fueled these fires, allowing juniper density to dramatically increase and invade drier, grassland sites during wetter periods. The density and growth of junipers into drier grassland sites makes them more susceptible to drought, secondary insects and juniper mistletoe infections.

    Forest diseases were also prominent in the state in 2007. Easily, the most visible was aspen leaf rust in the White Mountains in September and October. Previous increases in this disease have been noted in this area in 1977, 1986 and 1992. Infected aspen leaves turned a premature yellow and fell off well before the normal fall color change. During wet summers, this fungus builds to outbreak levels in susceptible aspen clones. Some of the affected areas include Green’s Peak, Sunrise & also east of Big Lake. Scattered, infected ornamental plantings of aspen were also detected in Greer and Show Low-Lakeside-Pinetop. Although growth loss occurs in heavily infected trees, trees typically recover from one season of infection. However, we may see further decline in aspens already weakened from the long-term drought.

    A second consecutive year of leaf infections caused by walnut anthracnose was noted mainly in the Prescott area in August. The disease is normally not a serious concern unless it’s present for more than one consecutive season. The premature defoliation will reduce growth and weaken the tree. The quantity and quality of the walnuts can also be reduced. If premature defoliation occurs repeatedly, dieback of twigs and branches may be noted. The disease was very visible in the Highland Pines area, Thumb Butte and along upper White Spar Road.

    Pinyon dwarf mistletoe, a parasitic plant was noted along Williamson Valley Road north of Prescott in April. A large swath of infected pinyons was identified at about mile post 15. Heavy brooming of branches and scattered dead pinyons were noted next to the highway. These pinyons were also heavily infested with pinyon needle scale. This is the second major site in the Prescott area where this parasitic plant has been identified.

    A second Austrian pine infected with Southwestern dwarf mistletoe was found planted underneath infected ponderosa pines in Strawberry in May. The first one was identified in 1993. Other non-native pines that have been infected by this native parasitic plant in the state include Mugho and Scotch pine. Planting of these non-native pines under infected ponderosa pines is not recommended.

    A new detection for the Prescott area in August was a reddening or bronzing of chokecherry leaves. Discolored plants were found in the Thumb Butte recreation area and in a drainage in Ponderosa Park. Affected leaves were easily stripped from the branches. Cause is unknown and affected plants will be re-examined in 2008 for a causal agent (s).

    Damage mainly to the needles of ponderosa pines caused by the use of magnesium chloride (MgC1) for dust abatement, was first noted along unpaved roads in the White Mountains in 2000. In June 2007, additional trees and shrubs were affected by the chemical in Greer, Nutrioso and Alpine. Discolored ponderosa pines, spruces, aspens and Arizona rose were visible in the Greer area. MgCl burn was also noted on ponderosa pines in Nutrioso and possibly on pinyon pines. The classic symptom noted on pines is needle tip burn or discoloration. On leaves, the edges turn brown. Care should be exercised when applying this chemical to avoid or reduce damage to valuable trees and shrubs growing along unpaved roadways.

    The continued expansion of non-native invasive plants in Arizona becomes a bigger concern with every passing year. Sweet resinbush, which was mistakenly planted in the 1930’s, has been identified in ten different locations in the state. This plant from Africa can outcompete our native plants creating very erodable soils. Efforts are underway to reduce the impact of this plant through several treatment techniques. However, a long-term commitment is needed to have any affect on this or other non-native, invasive plants in Arizona.

    Miscellaneous detections in 2007 include increased activity by tent caterpillars in spring mainly on aspens in the Flagstaff area, spider mites on Douglas-fir in Prescott in July, pinyon tip/ponderosa pine tip moth damage in Doney Park in July east of Flagstaff, slime mold underneath junipers in Timberland acres west of Show Low in August, and an assortment of colorful fruiting bodies of fungi in the Alpine area also in August. Bark beetles made a late August entrance southwest of Prescott on ponderosa pines, and spittlebugs were found on Arizona alders in Washington Park north of Payson in September. These miscellaneous detections are just a cross section of additional biological agents found in our forests in 2007.

    For further information about any of these observations, contact: Bob Celaya, Forest Health Specialist Office of the State Forester 602-771-1415



    NEWS ADVISORY, APRIL 7th - PINYON NEEDLE SCALE IS BACK - Pinyon needle scale, a native insect which defoliates and kills pinyon pine is again active in the Prescott area. Pinyon needle scale can be found spread over thousands of acres from Prescott Country Club to the Prescott Basin, and to Williamson Valley all the way up to Hootenanny Holler.

    Two of the areas with high populations of this insect include the Thumb Butte area and Granite Oaks in Williamson Valley.

    Female scales have emerged from their over-wintering stage on the needles in both of these areas. Very noticeable clusters of yellow eggs held together in loose, white, cottony webbing have been laid by the females mainly in branch crotches, along the underside of branches, on the trunk and at the base of the tree. The females die shortly after egg laying is completed.

    Heavily infested pinyons can be easily detected by the yellow or orange discoloration of the older needles towards the back of the branch. The needles are covered with small, black, bean-shaped scales which pierce the foliage and remove the sap, causing the needles to discolor, dry, and fall off. Small trees may be killed within a few years; whereas, larger trees may lose one or more branches and may take years to die. Mortality of larger trees may occur on drier sites during droughty periods.

    Most likely to die from the effects of the insect are pinyons growing on drier rocky outcrops, south and west facing slopes and transitional zones between pinyon-juniper and grassland vegetation types.

    Control of this stage of the insect involves Step 1: Washing the eggs off branches and trunk with a garden hose equipped with a high pressure nozzle and allowing eggs and litter one to two days to dry. Step 2: Raking eggs, litter and debris out from under the tree, and Step 3: Disposing of the eggs in plastic garbage bags. Raking may not be practical if heavy brush, rocks or other material is present under the tree. However, washing the eggs off the tree is still recommended.

    “Removal of the eggs from your pinyons will be simplified if you have already treated your vegetation for fire prevention reasons”.

    “Repeated washings may be necessary since not all eggs will be laid at once.” If you wash too late, eggs will have hatched and the young scales (crawlers) will have moved to the needles where they can be treated with insecticides. Egg hatch usually occurs in May, providing a long period of time for egg removal. However, heavy egg hatch was noted in the Williamson Valley area last year at the end of April—so don’t wait!

    Unless there are local water restrictions, consider slow, deep, and infrequent watering of your infested pinyons nearest your home, starting as soon as your soils dry out, with a soaker hose placed around the drip line of the tree. Continue watering until “monsoon” rains are well established.

    Also refer to the pinyon needle scale publication issued by the Cooperative Extension at: http://cals.arizona.edu/pubs/insects/az1315.pdf and their watering brochure at: http://cals.arizona.edu/pubs/water/az1298.pdf.

    For further information about this insect, or other forest health concerns in the Prescott area, contact: Bob Celaya, Forest Health Specialist, Office of the State Forester (602) 771-1415.



    NEWS ADVISORY, FEBRUARY 21st - SLASH DROP OFF - The Yavapai County Board of Supervisors is pleased to announce the commencement of a free slash drop off program beginning March 1st, 2008 at all County Transfer Stations. These Transfer Stations are located in Bagdad, Black Canyon City, Camp Verde, Congress, Mayer, Seligman, and Skull Valley. The program will end September 1st, 2008. Free slash drop off will be held during normal operating hours.

    This free slash drop off program will assist residents in developing necessary defensible space around their homes and other structures that could fuel fires. It is important for citizens to maintain defensible space around their property. Keeping fuels down is absolutely necessary to help avoid uncontrolled fires that can and do become extremely damaging.

    Please take advantage of the free slash drop off program and clean up around your properties. For additional information please contract Public Works Department at (928) 771-3183.



    NEWS ADVISORY, DECEMBER 3rd - AREAS ALONG THE VERDE RIVER CLOSED - The CAMP VERDE, AZ - The Forest Service will close two bald eagle breeding areas along the Verde River to the public on November 30, 2007. The closure is expected to last through June 30, 2008 when nesting season ends and fledglings are independent. The special closures are necessary to reduce human disturbances to the eagles during their nesting season in the Verde Valley. The possible consequences of people disturbing nesting eagles include abandonment of eggs and loss of young.

    The one closure area lies north of Clarkdale. It is the two-mile section of the Verde River and adjacent National Forest lands in the vicinity of Sycamore Creek downstream to the rapids/powerline crossing. The other area is south of Camp Verde. It is the two-mile section of the Verde River and adjacent National Forest lands in the vicinity of the "Verde Falls" downstream to below Sycamore Canyon. Road closures include Forest Road 9709R from its junction with Forest Road 574 and parts of Forest Road 500 south of Cottonwood Basin.

    River rafters may pass on the river in the closure areas but are restricted from stopping, taking out watercraft, or delaying their passage through the area. Signs are posted along the river to mark the closure boundaries.

    Common uses of the area such as hunting, target shooting, fishing, hiking and off-road vehicle use are prohibited. Violation of the closure is punishable by a fine of not more than $500 or imprisonment for not more than 6 months or both.

    Eagle watchers will be stationed at the closure areas to protect nesting eagles and to monitor the eagles' activities for the Arizona Bald Eagle Nestwatch Program. Protection of these breeding areas occurs annually through the cooperation of the Arizona Game and Fish Department, Coconino and Prescott National Forests, and the public.



    NEWS ADVISORY, NOVEMBER 23rd - BALD EAGLES ARE BACK AT LYNX LAKE - PRESCOTT, AZ - It’s that time again! Time for the bald eagle nesting closure at Lynx Lake. This is the last weekend of the season to hike around Lynx Lake until next summer. A pair of bald eagles successfully raised a young eagle at Lynx Lake last year. In hopes of a fifth successful season, the Prescott National Forest will implement an area closure around the nest area from Friday, November 30, 2007 until June 30, 2008.

    The area closure will include the trail along the east side of the lake and the associated portion of the shoreline, the area on the face of the dam, and part of the surface of the lake. The water surface closure will be marked with buoys. “I am looking forward to a fifth successful nesting season for bald eagles at Lynx Lake,” said Prescott National Forest Wildlife Biologist Noel Fletcher.

    Forest Service personnel will monitor the bald eagles at Lynx Lake to watch for eagles exhibiting breeding behavior. The winter of 2007/2008 marks the seventh nesting season for the eagles at Lynx Lake. “With four successful years of bald eagles’ nesting at Lynx Lake, including a healthy fledgling last year, the site has proven to be a safe and productive one for the eagles,” said Fletcher. By adhering to the posted closures, visitors can provide the eagles with the best opportunity for another successful nesting season.

    In cooperation with the Arizona Game and Fish Department, biologists with the Prescott National Forest have been monitoring wintering bald eagles at Lynx Lake, as well as Goldwater, Watson, and Willow Lakes for the past 13 years. Through the years, bald eagles have been seen at all four lakes during the early January survey.



    NEWS ADVISORY, OCTOBER 25th- WHY SOME AVERTED DISASTER - By Megan Garvey and David Pierson Los Angeles Times Staff WritersFor nearly an hour, Marianne Shannon thought Stevenson Ranch's luck had run out.

    The winds seemed so fast, much stronger than in 2003, when the last massive fire threatened her home. She watched from her cul-de-sac Monday afternoon as flames exploded just a few hundred feet away. A firefighter told her to take down her curtains to prevent them from igniting. Gusts knocked down the faux headstones she'd set up for Halloween.

    Then as quickly as the danger came, the threat passed. "The firemen were saying we were pretty well protected," Shannon said. Once again this 5,000 home master-planned community south of Santa Clarita emerged unscathed by fire.

    California cannot avoid wildfires. But proper building techniques have proved to greatly reduce the threat to homes and businesses. Fire safety experts said Stevenson Ranch, and other modern communities like it, have made their own luck.

    Precautions used there include fire-resistant materials such as concrete roof tiles, double-paned heat-resistant windows and enclosed eaves. A 200-foot greenbelt with fire-resistant plantings rings the property.

    Additional buffers of stone and concrete culverts were constructed behind properties adjacent to canyons and other open land.

    When it comes to saving homes and neighborhoods from fire, some developments are more equal than others. The story was the same this week in Orange County, where firefighters kept a raging 18,000-acre blaze from newer planned communities in Foothill Ranch, Irvine and Lake Forest.

    As fire threatened the newer developments of Portola Springs and Northwood on Sunday, fire officials decided to let residents take shelter in their homes rather than evacuate them, Capt. Stephen Miller of the Orange County Fire Authority said Sunday from near the frontline.

    "If we were not confident they would not be threatened, that we would not be able to save the homes, we would not put them in that situation," Miller said.

    But a significant number of California communities remain far short of such standards. Nearly 5 million homes in the state are at high to extreme risk from wildfires, and 84% of them are in urban areas abutting areas designated as wildlands, according to a report by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. That report was published in October 2003, the month deadly fires swept through the state and into backyards of Stevenson Ranch homes.

    Many fire-safe features in practice there are borne out of planning and building code changes enacted in the aftermath of devastating 1993 fires, said Ron Coleman, a former California state fire marshal and forestry and fire protection chief.

    Higher standards will soon be required of all new building statewide, at least in the zones where fire risk is highest. The California Building Standards Commission last month approved standards recommended by the state fire marshal for buildings in fire hazard zones.

    Those requirements are to go into effect in January 2008 in areas under state control, and after that date, any new permits issued in such zones will require that the new standards be met.

    New construction under local control won't have to meet the standards until July 2008, and then only buildings in "very high fire severity" zones must comply.

    "The fact that a neighborhood will survive an assault by a fire is a combination of factors," said Coleman, now vice president of Emergency Services Consulting Inc. in Elk Grove, Calif. "What I'm talking about is building tracts so there is defensible space built into the design, so access roads are built considering the need for fire engines to be coming in and evacuees going out."

    Changing building practices has not been easy, said Coleman, who noted that it has taken more than a decade for the concept of defensible space to win wide acceptance.

    Given the state's limited firefighting resources, he said, stringent requirements are needed. As the devastation this week made clear, there are too few fire crews to fight blazes block by block.

    "Defensible space assumes someone is going to be there defending the house," he said. "In my opinion, the home has to be survivable, and that means ignition-resistant construction that protects structures from radiant heat and embers."

    No one knows how many homeowners have done everything they can to protect their homes from wildfire. In a study released Tuesday, the nonprofit Natural Resources Defense Council examined the fire preparedness of the Love Creek neighborhood in Avery, a town in the central Sierra Nevada range. The community has about 50 homes built between 1940 and 2001 and was chosen because researchers considered it typical for mountain towns.

    "Not one home . . . complied with all the basic standards necessary to ensure survival from a forest fire," the report's authors wrote. "Every home assessed failed multiple safety measures."

    The estimate for bringing residences up to minimum standards averaged about $2,500, with $4,500 more needed, on average, to clear vegetation.

    Experts say fire protection efforts need to be communitywide to be effective.

    In neighborhoods that have been hard-hit by fire, "you will find that some individual property owners did everything they could to protect their property but were endangered by neighbors who didn't," Coleman said.

    Many homeowners ordered to evacuate make costly mistakes, Coleman said, leaving windows or garage doors open, not clearing flammable items from near the house. Even something as simple as using tinfoil to reflect the heat from windows facing a down slope can decrease the likelihood of a home's igniting, he said.

    Firefighters say neighborhoods and homes that appear girded for fire are more likely to be defended when hard choices about resources need to be made. Well-designed communities are also less likely to require evacuations, even when blazes get close.

    In Stevenson Ranch, where red fire retardant stained the nearby hillsides and residents had garden hoses ready to douse flying embers, resident Laurie Sarman said firefighters deployed to her cul-de-sac did not seem worried. One firefighter reassured her.

    "He was confident, even in the winds, that our house wasn't going anywhere," said Sarman, who lived there through the 2003 scare as well.

    On Tuesday, life seemed mostly back to normal in Stevenson Ranch. Couples walked their dogs, joggers crossed the neighborhood and children skateboarded, their schools closed for the day.

    Eating al fresco at a cafe off Stevenson Ranch Parkway, Mike and Monika Cook said that between the firefighters and the precautions already taken, they were not worried.

    Just as they are most days, landscapers were out working, with sprinklers watering surrounding grounds. The homeowners association newsletter published earlier in the year urged residents to call if they saw any thick vegetation so it could be taken away.

    "They've got it under control," said Monika Cook, her dog Buddy panting by her side. "The homeowners association keeps the brush clear. They don't leave it to residents to do it."

    For Sarman, who admits to "freaking out" during the 2003 fires, this week proved less stressful. That close call, she said, was an awakening."We just didn't think about it [before]. It never crossed our minds. I mean, what's brush?" she said.

    Now educated, Sarman surveyed her property with a new eye.

    "We have a nice line of defense," she said.



    NEWS ADVISORY, SEPTEMBER 21st - STATE FORESTERS PROMOTE COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLANS TO REDUCE RISKS- National Association of State Foresters, National survey shows progress. America’s wildfire environment has changed. Recent trends in climate, fuels, and demographics are contributing to the increased frequency of large and costly fires. To exacerbate this issue, more and more people are living in fire-prone areas. A 2005 federal study found that in the 1990s, 8.4 million homes – 60 percent of the new houses built in the U.S. – were added to wildland urban interface (WUI) areas nationwide.

    Although the risks may be high, communities are empowered to protect themselves. According to a 2007 survey by the National Association of State Foresters (NASF), approximately 3,300 at-risk (for fire) communities have a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) in place, a 22% increase from the year before. Part of the Healthy Forests Restoration Act of 2003, CWPPs help to reduce risk and damage and increase the ability to successfully suppress fires. By developing and receiving approval of a CWPP, communities can help to shape federal land fuel reduction project prioritization. The plans require collaboration among landowners and federal, state, and local officials.

    “The main purposes of a CWPP are for localities to take responsibility for their own wildfire protection by building their mitigation capacity and identifying priority fuel reduction projects,” says Jeff Jahnke, chair of the NASF Forest Fire Protection Committee. “These plans provide for a collaborative approach to community protection, which is critical to success. You have buy-in and a plan that fits the community, and the process itself helps landowners take responsibility for their own protection from fire.”

    The number of acres nationwide consumed by wildfire in 2007 is rapidly approaching record-setting 2006 numbers. But those figures don’t paint the whole picture; it’s not just a matter of how many acres are burning, but where those acres are. The 600-acre Tin Cup fire in Montana was just a few hundred yards uphill from homes and just two miles from businesses and residents in downtown Darby – and they were ready. With a CWPP in place, the town of Darby has received Federal State Fire Assistance grants and has been implementing fuels reduction projects over the past four years. “When and if a fire gets here, the town is prepared,” says Nan Christiansen, public affairs officer for the Bitterroot National Forest.

    The rural community of Taylor, FL, is surrounded by hundreds of thousands of acres of federal, state, and private wildland and has been affected by large wildfires in the past. With the assistance of state and federal agencies, the community developed a CWPP in September 2006 and prioritized tactics including fuel reduction steps such as prescribed burning and creating fire control lines; community education; and actions to improve wildland fire response.

    “Residents learned how to protect their property from wildfires, and an 11-mile control line was constructed to serve as a fuel break and a strategic point to base firefighting operations from,” says Annaleasa Winter, a wildfire mitigation specialist with the Florida Division of Forestry. The town’s efforts were put to the test when the Bugaboo Fire forced an evacuation on May 8.

    Many fire officials believe that the measures taken under the CWPP helped to save the community. “Because of the CWPP and backfires set along the control line, firefighters were able to guide the fire around the community and prevented the loss of any structures in Taylor,” says Winter.

    As the number of communities at risk from wildfires rises, CWPPs become increasingly valuable tools to help in saving lives and property. NASF hopes these stories will inspire the development of many more CWPPs. “We have made a lot of progress but there is still work to be done,” notes Jahnke.

    Communities can work with their state forestry agency to develop a CWPP; for a listing of all state forestry agencies, visit http://www.stateforesters.org.



    NEWS ADVISORY, JULY 9th- ARIZONA FOREST RESTORATION PRODUCTS INC. - Arizona Forest Restoration Products (AZFRP) plans to construct a state-of-the art OSB manufacturing facility in order to implement meaningful scale thinning of the forest, and produce, sell, and distribute high-quality oriented strand board (OSB). To read more about AZ Forest Restoration Products please click on the following link, and select the different options to the left of the page: Forest Restoration Products



    NEWS ADVISORY, JUNE 15th- REMAINING SAFE SHOULD BE YOUR FIRST PRIORITY - With the annual onset of warm weather and excellent hiking conditions the Yavapai County Sheriff’s Office once again wants to urge safety and caution when hiking in our wilderness areas. Every year hundreds of people take to the trails in and around Yavapai County and in too many instances they end up as subjects for our Search & Rescue teams due to becoming lost, injured or stranded.

    hiking
    Map from arizonahikingtrails.com

    For your safety, please be certain you are prepared before heading out on a hike or camping trip. A survival situation can happen to anyone and doesn't always result from inexperience in the outdoors or recklessness. However, survival is an attitude that needs to begin before you leave your house- not simply when you hit the trailhead. Being prepared is critical and can often mean the difference between having to spend a miserable night in the outdoors or returning home safely.

    Here are some very good survival tips that could save your life.

  • Be sure someone knows where you are going and when to expect you back, and do not stray from your planned route.
  • Check with local ranger stations for updated trail information. Many of the published materials or information taken from on-line sites is out-dated, trails become washed out or overgrown and often hikers are not fully aware of the length of time or distance required to complete their hike.
  • Carry plenty of water (more than you think you will need), matches, flashlight, suitable and adequate clothing, as well as enough food to sustain you for longer than you have planned.
  • Get into the habit of carrying at least three fire making sources on you. One of the best emergency fire starters are 100% cotton balls smeared with vaseline (a petroleum product).
  • Carry a small first aid kit if possible, and include sun screen.
  • Carry a signal mirror in your pocket
  • Always have a bandanna with you, it can be used as a: water strainer, cap, scarf, water collector- use to dip into rock or tree pockets, flag for signaling, pot holder, lashing material, first-aid sling for injured arm, washcloth, and even a fire starter.
  • Determine weather conditions. Rain in the high country can create flash flooding in the driest of gullies and washes and a dry day can cause dehydration without the hiker even realizing it.
  • Cell phones are good to have with you for emergencies but often do not work when hiking in remote areas, so be aware of this.
  • Last but not least: Know your limits and when it is time to turn back or stop to rest.
  • Let's say you do all of these things and you still run into Murphy's Law in the backcountry. Keep a Positive Mental Attitude. Main Keys to remember are: Sit down, remain calm by assessing your situation (Are you injured? Did you leave a travel plan with someone? What resources do you have in your pockets?). Being calm is a truly critical survival trait to possess.

    To go hiking, camping, or backpacking, you need to have good gear. Here is some helpful hints on what you should always have with you.

  • 1 Gallon of Water (per person), in a Hydration System.
  • High Energy Snacks.
  • Hat, Sunglasses, and Sunscreen (I recommend SPF 30 or higher).
  • Hiking boots.
  • Compass or GPS, as well as Topo Maps.
  • Hiking Sticks.
  • Camera.
  • First Aid Kit and Emergency Rain Ponchos.

    To learn more about these items and recomended brands and reviews on Hydration Systems, boots and other items, please click on the following link:Arizona Hiking Trails

    The Yavapai County Sheriff’s Office wants everyone to be able to enjoy our wilderness areas. If an emergency happens we will be there to assist in every way possible, but to remain safe should be your first priority.

    Hiking tips provided by: Yavapai County Sheriff's Office, The Walking Connection and Arizona Hiking Trails.



    NEWS ADVISORY, JUNE 11th - FOREST RESTORATION PRODUCTS AND EARTH FRIENDLY FUELS ANNOUNCE A STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP FOR THE UTILIZATION OF BIOMASS IN NORTHERN ARIZONA - Arizona Forest Restoration Products (AZFRP) and Earth Friendly Fuels are pleased to announce that they have decided to form a strategic partnership for the utilization of the biomass generated during the forest restorative thinning planned by AZFRP in the Northern Arizona ponderosa pine forests.

    Earth Friendly Fuels, a private company formed by Diane and David Williamson, of Flagstaff, plans to build a hybrid ethanol plant in the Greater Flagstaff area. The ethanol plant will have the capability to produce 50 million gallons of corn ethanol annually, with the possibility to upgrade the process to the production of cellulosic ethanol when this technology reaches industrial maturity. The ethanol plant will use a hybrid fuel system, capable of supplying the electricity and steam required for the manufacturing of ethanol by burning either natural gas or woody biomass. The annual consumption of biomass by the ethanol plant is expected to be around 200,000 tons, or approximately half of the biomass that the OSB plant thinning operations will generate.

    “Two of the fundamental commitments that AZFRP made to the Northern Arizona community when we initiated the OSB project, were: 1) to do things right; and 2) to proactively support local businesses in their endeavor to benefit from the critical-mass effect that the OSB plant will create” said Pascal Berlioux, President & C.E.O. of Arizona Forest Restoration Products (AZFRP). “We are pleased to fulfill these commitments by supporting the Williamsons ethanol project. The ethanol plant will contribute to the forest restoration goal a productive use of the biomass that the OSB plant cannot process, and will also contribute significantly to the growth of the local ecologically and economically sustainable forest industry that is needed to fund the restorative thinning”. “There are still many operational and logistic details to iron out, but we believe that Earth Friendly Fuel’s business fundamentals are strong, and we are committed to provide them with as much business and technical support as they need. This is a very exciting synergy”.

    “We expect our collaboration to culminate in a long-term, large-volume biomass supply agreement between AZFRP and Earth Friendly Fuels, as soon as AZFRP receives the long-term large-scale stewardship contract that we seek to implement the landscape-scale restoration of the Northern Arizona ponderosa pine forest”.

    “Partnering with Arizona Forest Restoration Products is a great opportunity for Earth Friendly Fuels to contribute to the restoration of the Arizona forest while aiding significantly to the national effort toward building a future of sustainable fuels” said Diane Williamson, President & C.E.O. of Earth Friendly Fuels. “The hybrid power system of the ethanol plant will utilize the biomass produced by AZFRP’s restorative thinning on the western side of the Mogollon Rim, essentially in the Kaibab National Forest and western part of the Coconino National Forest, and we will also have the ability to absorb pinion juniper biomass produced by the restoration efforts conducted in Yavapai County. This collaboration between our two companies reinforces the inherent strengths of Earth Friendly Fuels, and will allow us to focus on our areas of expertise: corn ethanol, the development of cellulosic ethanol technology, and the sequestration of carbon”.

    Please feel free to contact Pascal Berlioux at Arizona Forest Restoration Products or Diane Williamson at Earth Friendly Fuels for further details. For further information on Arizona Forest Restoration Products please visit: Arizona Forest Restoration Products. AZFRP recent press releases can be found at: Press Release



    NEWS ADVISORY, JUNE 1st - USFS SWEAT AS FIREFIGHTING COSTS SOAR - Until the mid-1990s, the Forest Service was able to borrow money in trust funds deposited by timber sale buyers, and Congress reimbursed the agency. That worked well enough until the number of wildfires skyrocketed and timber sales declined, forcing the agency to divert funds from research, land acquisition, even hazardous fuels reduction projects meant to limit fire danger. As of May 22, more than 34,000 wildfires had burned 866,561 acres of U.S. land this year, well above the eight-year average of 801,094 acres, according to the National Interagency Fire Center. "This fire season has started early, and it's big," Crandall said.

    To read more of the report by Dan Berman, Land Letter senior reporter; please click on the following link: Fire Fighting Funds



    NEWS ADVISORY, MAY 22nd- A 20 YEAR ROAD MAP FOR ACHIEVING SUSTAINABLE FORESTS, ECONOMIES, AND COMMUNITIES -

  • Background
  • - Many of Arizona’s fire-adapted forests are at risk of unnatural, severe fires because of poor forest health. These fires lead to skyrocketing costs for fire suppression, pollute surface water and impair watersheds, diminish recreational opportunities, threaten community and biological values, and have a negative impact on tourism and the economies of recreation-dependent communities. Fortunately, targeted forest restoration may provide a solution.

  • What is the Statewide Strategy for Restoring Arizona’s Forests?
  • - The Statewide Strategy for Restoring Arizona Forests presents a 20-year road map for restoring forest health, building sustainable forest-based businesses, and protecting our rural communities from wildfire. The strategy is a response to the desire expressed by Arizona citizens at three Forest Health Summits, members of the state legislature and the Governor for a coherent plan of action to improve forest health and reduce the risk of unnatural wildfire to forests and Communities.

    In 2005, a subcommittee of the Governor’s Forest Health Advisory and Oversight Councils initiated a collaborative process to identify the steps required to restore forests. The subcommittee made fifteen recommendations and identified associated action items that provide the starting point for implementation of the Statewide Strategy. Based on sound ecological and social science, the Statewide Strategy incorporates valuable insights and techniques from successful and innovative efforts already underway in Arizona in order to promote the strategic and efficient use of resources and achieve ecosystem restoration on a landscape scale.

  • How can I participate?
  • - There are two ways to submit comments and participate in the process: Comment online. The complete document can be found at: Statewide Strategy. The site provides an email address to send comments. The public is welcome to provide input until May 28, 2007.

  • Attend a public meeting
  • - The Governor’s Forest Health Councils has organized meetings in Tucson, Flagstaff, Phoenix, Pinetop and now Prescott. All meetings will be held from 5:30 until 8:30 PM. Participants will be given the opportunity to see the strategy presented (from 6-6:30) and to provide comments orally or in writing.

  • The next meeting will be held in Prescott on Wednesday, May 30th 5:30 p.m. - 7:00 p.m. at the University of Arizona Cooperative Extension Office, 840 Rodeo Drive, Bldg C. Prescott, AZ. The Gail Gardner gate is the best entrance for this building.
  • For more information Visit the website at: Statewide Strategy or call Jean Palumbo, Strategy Coordinator at 928-523-0608.



    NEWS ADVISORY, MAY 10th - FOREST HEALTH CONDITIONS REPORT STATE AND PRIVATE LANDS - ARIZONA 2006 SUMMARY For the second consecutive year, variable weather conditions had a major affect on the overall health of our forests in Arizona. A very dry 2005-2006 winter caused extensive discoloration of foliage mainly at the lower elevations in the chaparral & oak-juniper vegetation types. In addition due to the mild winter temperatures, heavy populations of aphids were also detected again mainly in the lower elevation vegetation types.

    More alarming was the eruption of the “February Fire” north of Payson presaging a very serious fire season, along with the associated effects of drought on our forests.

    Noticeable due to the damaged appearance of the forest vegetation, were the numerous prescribe burns initiated by different land management agencies in the state in 2006. These treatments are necessary, but in some cases they caused very extensive scorch and mortality of the remaining vegetation.

    Strong winds on the Catalina Mountains in February had yet another interesting effect on our forests. Surviving ponderosa pine trees exposed to strong winds by the devastating “Aspen Fire” in 2003, came crashing down for the second year in a row.

    Strong winds were also a factor in breaking down dead pinyon pines in the Doney Park area east of Flagstaff in February, increasing the fire hazard. The trees were killed by Ips bark beetles stressed by drought in 2002-2003.

    Saved by the numerous snows & rains in March, conditions in our forests improved dramatically in the spring. However, a riparian site in southeast Arizona was not a beneficiary of this rainfall—the moisture came too late. Drought conditions since about 2002 (and maybe earlier) had already taken a serious toll on the mature cottonwoods, willows and hackberry trees growing along a stretch of the Santa Cruz River near Rio Rico, AZ.

    Additional windthrow & windbreak, mainly of ponderosa pine, was noted on the Catalina Mountains in mid-April following reported peak wind gusts of 93 mph! Wind gusts which also snapped trees in half & stripped branches from the trees.

    Conspicuous due to their number were broom-like growths on juniper trees in the Prescott area in April. A species of Gymnosporangium rust was tentatively identified as the cause of these unusual growths.

    Tiger moth tents containing the caterpillars that produce this webbing were very visible in the Flagstaff area in May, mainly on the tops of ponderosa pines. Populations of this insect have been reported in the Flagstaff area before and then all the way over to the White Mountains in previous years.

    Several pockets of Ips bark beetle-killed ponderosa pines were detected in S. E. Payson & east of Payson in late May and June. This was the most bark beetle activity noted anywhere in the state during the year.

    Tent caterpillars were highly visible in May along Highway 87 between Payson & Pine, & in Prescott on common chokecherry. Tents produced by these insects were also found on AZ white oak in Prescott. In addition, tent caterpillars were noted on three-leaf sumacs along Townsend-Winona Rd. in east Flagstaff & on currants in Parks, AZ in early June.

    Pine tip moth activity was mainly concentrated in the Lakeside-Pinetop area in July. Tips of seedling ponderosa pines, thoroughly destroyed by the caterpillar stage of this insect, were readily visible in the area.

    Much more visible in the Show Low-Lakeside-Pinetop area were the numerous new developments widely affecting the health of the remaining forest. It can take up to ten years for the remaining trees damaged by construction, to die from these types of disturbances. Proper construction practices before during and after development can largely mitigate any additional tree losses.

    Juxtaposed to these new and older developments are a series of very large fuelbreaks constructed around those communities. These much needed fire-prevention treatments will also affect the health of the remaining trees for several years. Probably the most impressive fuelbreak has been built around the community of Pine & is visible with satellite imagery from space.

    Variable weather conditions were once again experienced in 2006 during the summer “monsoon” season which produced high amounts of rainfall throughout most of the state.

    The appearance of walnut anthracnose foliage disease, in the Prescott & Payson areas in August & September, was largely due to the increased rainfall. The disease was more curious than damaging to the walnuts due to the fact that the trees shed their leaves in the fall.

    Even more dramatic was the profusion of forest floor fungi responding to the increased rainfall in the White Mountains in August. In addition to forest floor fungi, the fruiting bodies of a fungi found on the trunks of walnuts was highly visible in September in the Prescott area.

    The discovery of two non-native & invasive plant species in July & September points out yet another threat to the health of our forests, which is usually overlooked. The presence of the very invasive Tree of Heaven in Show Low may be the highest elevation in which this tree has been found growing in AZ.

    The second, although a highly attractive plant, was a grass species found growing along the Catalina Highway at about 3500’ in elevation in September. This highly flammable grass from South Africa is called Natal grass. This is the third species of non-native grass found thoroughly infesting the roadway at the base of the Catalina Mountains. Fountain & Buffel grass, also from South Africa are already well established and pose a serious threat to our native vegetation when they do burn. These grasses are dependent on fire for their distribution.

    Unusual pine tip moth activity was detected in the Prescott area in August & September, which was different from the normal type of damage described for the Pinetop-Lakeside area in July. The damage caused by the caterpillar stage of the insect occurred only at the base of the needles on the tips of sapling ponderosa pines. Previous examinations of the pine tip moth species in Prescott indicated a complex of species rather than a single species. This may explain the different types of damage experienced in the two areas of the state.

    Walnut leafhopper burn was again noted in the Prescott & Payson areas in September. These insects have been noted before in the state and were even more noticeable in 2005 in the community of Star Valley. Discoloration caused by this insect is more unsightly than damaging even though there is some growth loss to the infested trees. The leaves are shed in a few weeks with the advent of fall. Some of these infested trees were also infected with walnut anthracnose.

    Also in fall, the return of fall webworm was most visible in the Sedona & Village of Oak Creek areas in September. Cottonwoods seemed to be the favorite host, with many festooned with the characteristic webbing on the branch tips.

    And even more visible in the Village of Oak Creek, was the severe damage caused by “La Barranca” fire in early June. Much of the vegetation at the eastern end of this community was totally destroyed by the fire. Other trees & shrubs that were scorched by the fire may die in the coming years.

    The “Brins Fire” in lower Oak Creek Canyon also in June, caused extensive mortality of the vegetation on steep slopes. These slopes eroded with the heavy summer rains creating problems for traffic and homeowners along the canyon. Scorched trees and shrubs in this area will also die in the next few years, and some will be undermined by future erosion.

    Variable weather was once again a factor in September in the Prescott area. Dramatic hail damage to pines, oaks & AZ Cypress was visible in the southwest side of town. Foliage of these affected species was strewn around these trees. Hail can have long-lasting effects on vegetation by damaging bark and knocking off twigs exposing the damaged areas to insects and diseases.

    Walnut trees seemed to be the star attraction in 2006 with yet another observation in several areas of the state. Very noticeable brooming of tree branches was detected in Prescott, Pine and Oak Creek Canyon. Cause is unknown and trees will be re-examined in spring of 2007 for a causal agent(s).

    2006 was definitely a banner year for numerous forest insects, diseases and weather- related observations. Spider mites, pinyon needle scale, oak branch girdlers, pinyon webworms, cypress/juniper beetles, mistletoes on non-native trees, slime molds, pinyon tip moths, elm leaf beetles, bordered plant bugs and willow leaf rosettes caused by midges, are just some examples of the great diversity detected in our forests in 2006.



    NEWS ADVISORY, APRIL 30th - INVASIVE AND/OR NOXIOUS WEEDS ARE SPREADING ACROSS NORTHERN ARIZONA Invasive, noxious weeds impact everyone by displacing native plants and wildlife, impacting recreation, and lowering property values. The West Yavapai Weed Management Area is hosting a Noxious/Invasive Weed Workshop on *Monday May 14, 2006 from 9 AM to 3 PM* at the University of Arizona Cooperative Extension Office in Prescott at 840 Rodeo Dr #C (on the Prescott Rodeo Grounds).

    The morning will be an indoor seminar covering: impacts of noxious/invasive species in Arizona, a closer look at identification and management strategies for noxious/invasive weeds in and around Yavapai County, biocontrol strategies used to manage noxious/invasive weeds in Arizona, and how the average citizen can make a difference in controlling the spread of noxious/invasive weeds. A local field trip will follow the morning seminar. Carpooling on the field trip is encouraged.

    Presenters will be Ed Northam, University of Arizona Invasive Plant Program Manager; Dewey Murray, USDA APHIS; and Jeff Schalau, University of Arizona Cooperative Extension. The program costs $15.00, includes lunch, refreshments, and printed materials. Pre-registration is not necessary.



    NEWS ADVISORY, APRIL 17th- THE AGREEMENT TO INITIATE (ATI), WAS RECENTLY SIGNED BY ALL -The Forest Service announced today that significant progress has occurred toward completion of the Yavapai Ranch Land Exchange as directed by the Northern Arizona Land Exchange Act signed into law in November 2005.

    A document called the Agreement to Initiate (ATI), required for all federal exchanges, was recently signed by all parties to the exchange. The purpose of the ATI is to identify and describe each parcel potentially involved in the exchange as well as all reservations, easements, and third party rights. “All provisions in the ATI are consistent with the provisions of the federal legislation, and only lands identified in the legislation are included,” said Prescott National Forest Supervisor Alan Quan.

    “The ATI is a preliminary but important step in the land exchange process,” Quan said. “It is a road map for the actual exchange. The name is a little misleading. We have been working diligently on the exchange mandated by Public Law 109-110 and have completed much of the field work for the various assessments that are required.”

    Quan noted that the legislated exchange, which primarily seeks to consolidate the acreage into separate private and public contiguous areas on Yavapai Ranch northwest of Prescott, was the subject of significant public comment as its authorizing legislation was being debated in Congress.

    Federal lands to be traded on the Prescott National Forest include the checkerboard lands and parcels in Camp Verde and south of Prescott. Also included are federal lands in the cities of Williams and Flagstaff on the Kaibab and Coconino National Forests. Most of the federal lands off of the checkerboard will be conveyed to the cities and existing youth camps occupying the lands. The exchange provides opportunities for the affected communities to improve and expand municipal services for airports, water and sewer treatment plants, and recreation.

    The ATI was signed by the Forest Service, Yavapai Ranch Limited Partnership, SunCor, and First American Title Insurance Company as participants in the exchange.



    NEWS ADVISORY, MARCH 21st - PINYON NEEDLE SCALE, A NATIVE INSECT WHICH DEFOLIATES AND KILLS PINYON PINE, IS AGAIN ACTIVE IN THE PRESCOTT AREA - Small trees may be killed within a few years; whereas, larger trees may lose one or more branches and may take years to die. Mortality of larger trees may occur on drier sites during droughty periods. To read more about the Pinyon Needle Scale and ways to help, please click on the following link:Needle Scale Alert



    NEWS ADVISORY, MARCH 21st - WHERE THE SMOKE IS, WRITEN BY GENE TWARONITE, UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA DEFENSIBLE SPACE - First, the bad news. Fire is inevitable in our wildlands. Despite our best efforts, we will always have wildfires. Prescott National Forest averages 90 wildfires per year, with about 60% caused by lightning. And to keep future fires from becoming catastrophic and to improve forest health, we will start more fires in the form of prescribed burns, which means even more smoke.

    If you would like to read the entire article, please click on the following link:WHERE THE SMOKE IS



    NEWS ADVISORY, FEBRUARY 14th- FIGHTING SWEET RESINBUSH CONTINUES - CAMP VERDE, AZ(February 13, 2007)— Beginning March 1, 2007, Prescott National Forest officials plan to treat an infestation of the noxious weed, sweet resinbush. This is a continuation of treatment that started in 2001. The treatment site is located approximately 3 miles south of Cottonwood at the junction of Ogden Ranch and Camino Real Roads. The infestation occurs on approximately 30 acres (21 acres of Federal land and 9 acres of private land).

    Crews will be applying herbicide to the infestation March 1, through the end of May 2007, weather permitting. The herbicides to be used are Tordon 22K (picloram) and Reclaim (clopyralid). The herbicides will be applied by an ATV-mounted sprayer and backpack sprayers.

    “Operations will only be conducted under specific weather conditions,” said project manager Kelli Spleiss. “We will suspend the treatment if the wind velocity exceeds 6 miles per hour or if precipitation is occurring or imminent.”

    The treatment is a continuation of a 2001 decision to treat the infestation using an Integrated Vegetation Management (IVM) approach. The IVM approach includes using mowing, hand digging, and herbicide application as the most effective, economical, and environmentally acceptable practices to control this plant. The mowing and hand digging were accomplished in 2001, with follow-up spraying in 2003 through 2006. The public is encouraged to stay off of the site until the herbicide dries, normally 24 hours.



    NEWS ADVISORY, FEBRUARY 8th - CHOOSING FIREWISE PLANTS FOR YOUR LANDSCAPE - All vegetation, naturally occurring and otherwise, is potential fuel for fire. Its type, amount, and arrangement can have dramatic effects on fire behavior. There are no “fireproof” plant species. Plant choice, spacing and maintenance are critical; where and how you plant can be more important than what species you use. However, given options, choose plant species for your landscape that are more fire resistant. To learn more about firwise landscaping please click on the attached link:Firewise Plants for 3,000ft and higher



    NEWS ADVISORY, JANUARY 5th - WHY WE BURN, WRITEN BY GENE TWARONITE, UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA DEFENSIBLE SPACE EDUCATOR - While public acceptance of prescribed burning in the greater Prescott area is largely positive, a very small but vocal minority of area residents continues to voice its opposition. Speaking for the Prescott Wildland/Urban Interface Commission, of which I am a member, I wish to share some perspectives on why we burn.

    The Commission known as PAWUIC is a collaborative group composed of volunteer citizens and member individuals from city, county, state and federal agencies. Since its formation in 1990, its chief task has been to identify, prioritize, and guide the management of wildland/urban interface practices in the greater Prescott area. A major part of this task is helping citizens become more aware of issues related to wildfire and its effects. Newcomers to our area often lack understanding of what it means to live in the interface and need to be informed. But established residents also need to be reminded of our wildland responsibilities, even if this means occasionally enduring smoke and runny eyes.

    In speaking to various groups, I point out that fire is a natural part of our environment. People in the audience nod their heads in agreement, but I wonder: do they truly understand the implications of this fact?

    The vegetation types in our area – ponderosa pine, pinon-juniper-oak woodland, chaparral, and grassland – all evolved with fire. Fire makes them what they are. Though sometimes erupting as large crown fires consuming entire forests, “pre-European settlement” fires more often occurred as low intensity, surface fires. These fires consumed excess needles, branches and other fine fuels, and recycled their nutrients. They stimulated wildflowers, grasses, and forbs, providing food and openings for wildlife. They maintained the park-like spacing so characteristic of our Southwestern forests and woodlands by killing off tree and shrub seedlings and saplings that would otherwise grow up too dense. They seared and pruned away lower branches that might carry fire into crowns. They kept insect eggs and diseases in check while reducing competition for remaining trees, thus making them more resistant to drought and beetles. And sometimes they even replaced whole stands of trees or shrubs, creating diverse mosaic landscapes. Without the vital shaping process of fire, our vegetation types are like dunes without the wind, or animal populations without predators.

    But wildfire is also messy, smelly, and sometimes destructive. Historically wildfires often caused catastrophic damage to vegetation, watersheds, homes, property and life. Public sentiment demanded action. That is why the U.S. Forest Service embarked on a primary mission, almost a century ago, not only to suppress but to eliminate all forest fires. Other agencies followed suit. Smokey Bear messages convinced the public that all forest fires should be prevented. And years of unmanaged grazing also added its toll, removing the fine fuels that could safely carry fires through forests and replacing them with hotter-burning shrubs and trees.

    Despite some early voices advocating for the possible uses of fire as a forestry tool, and despite ecological research regarding fire’s essential natural role in ecosystems, political pressures continued to favor the policy of suppression. Too much had been invested in putting out fires, and too many expensive homes had been built in the interface. It wasn’t until the 1990’s that a widespread consensus emerged among federal land managers that, while suppressing unwanted catastrophic wildfires was still necessary, trying to eliminate fire completely from western forests was a huge mistake.

    Here in the Prescott area, for example, the Prescott Basin Fire History Project (Sneed, P., L. Floyd-Hanna, and D. Hanna, 2002), conducted for the Prescott National Forest by Prescott College, concluded “that fire was a keystone process in several dominant vegetation types.” Using cross-dated, tree ring fire scar samples, the study also confirmed “with solid data what many forest managers and fire fighters suspected – namely that fires burned much more frequently, but with less intensity, than they do today.” Its authors supported a systematic, integrated return of fire to the Prescott Basin in order to return and maintain ponderosa pine and other ecosystems that are ecologically healthy and more resistant to crown fires.

    Because of this attempted exclusion of fire for so long, fire managers have become increasingly alarmed at the dangerous overloaded fuel conditions that have developed not just here in Prescott but throughout the West. According to one estimate, half of all western forests have disrupted natural fire regimes (the characteristic total pattern of fires within a vegetation type as described by intensity, frequency, and effect on vegetation). Fuel loads, as a result, have increased dramatically in the past 100 years – by nine times more in central Arizona. In the Prescott Basin area wildfires are increasing in number, size and severity to such an extent that the Ecological Restoration Institute of Northern Arizona has identified it as being “in grave danger of catastrophic fire,” with one of the highest interface fire risks in the Southwest.

    Climate change is also having an impact. According to a study published in Science, August 2006, wildfire activity in the western United States has notably increased in the past two decades. The wildfire season now runs 78 days longer, while the total area burned is 6.5 times larger than it was back in the 1970’s and early 1980’s.

    Faced with these grim numbers, the U.S. Forest service began to follow a policy of restoration forestry in the 1990’s. It aim was to restore ecosystems to a more natural diverse state that was more resilient and resistant to wildfire by employing a combination of practices such as fuel reduction, selective thinning, and natural and prescribed burns. Today, the Forest Service, National Park Service, and Bureau of Land Management all have fire management plans detailing exactly how and when fire will be employed.

    As a management tool, prescribed burning has much to offer. Not only does it confer upon the landscape the ecological benefits that fire suppression took away, but it’s also much cheaper than mechanical thinning. Two recent studies by the Forest Service also suggest that mere thinning, when unaccompanied by the burning of brush or debris, may actually increase forest fire damage rather than reduce it.

    This is not to say that returning fire to a landscape so altered by development will be easy. “Man is by nature a political animal,” warned Aristotle over 2,000 years ago, and little has changed since. Today, there are those who would argue in the name of public health against using prescribed burns, pointing to the hazards of fine particulate matter produced by wood smoke. Or they bring up public safety, citing examples of things getting out of control, such as the National Park Service’s prescribed burn in 2000 that burned 200 homes in Los Alamos, New Mexico. As always, some will complain merely because of personal inconvenience. And a few will be against any human alterations to the wildlands.

    A little perspective is in order. According to several recent studies, it is estimated that prior to 1900 fires burned about 20 million acres per year in the western United States. This is about eight times the annual combined average of wildfires and prescribed burns, and more than twice the 9.5 million acres that have so far burned this year in the entire U.S. including Alaska (as reported to the National Interagency Coordination Center).

    Geologist and explorer, John Wesley Powell, described the late 19th century West as a region of smoke and fire. Dr. Thomas W. Swetnam, Director of the Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research at the University of Arizona, in studying fire scarred tree ring samples, found that in the year 1748 fire occurred in 41 of the 63 sites he studied. He concludes: “If you were in the Southwest in 1748, it would be extremely smoky.”

    In the past couple of months, according to Curtis Heaton, USFS Forest Fire Management Officer for the Prescott National Forest, about 4,000 acres have been prescribed burned over the entire forest out of an annual target of 11,000 acres. Of the hundreds of calls he’s received, only a couple of dozen have been openly critical. Most people just want confirmation or explanation of the burn, and are satisfied when given this information. That’s a really small number when compared to the 85,000 residents in the Tri-City area.

    In the words of Dr. Swetnam, “We can either have regular, planned, low severity surface fires and smoke, or irregular, unplanned crown fires and smoke.” The choice is ours.

    ***

    Current information on prescribed burns can be found at the following web site: Prescott National Forest web site: Prescott National Forest Along with this web page; Regionalinfo-alert.org.
    If you would like to learn more about PAWUIC you may visit the Prescott Area Wildland Urban Interface Commission web page: PAWUIC
    (Note: In addition to the reports mentioned and various Internet sources, information for this article was also taken from the excellent book on restoration forestry, Mimicking Nature’s Fire: Restoring Fire-Prone Forests in the West by Stephen F. Arno and Carl E. Fiedler.)

    Next: An article on the air quality issues of prescribed burning and what the USFS and other agencies are doing to address them.



    NEWS ADVISORY, DECEMBER 15th - CLIMATE CHANGE AND VIANRIABILITY IN THE SOUTHWEST - The University of Arizona Cooperative Extension has produced the second article of forest health dealing with Climate Change and Forests. Please click on the attached link to read the article. Second Forest Health Publication



    OTHER RECENT STORIES:

    If you missed any of the following stories, just left-click on its headline below:

  • December 12 - Forest Service Announces Sycamore Cabin Rental Fee Increase
  • December 8 - Ruth Greek Oak Personal Use Fuelwood Permits
  • December 8 - 100 Year Old Groom Creek Schoolhouse Renting
  • November 30 - Bald Eagles Expected to Return to Nest at Lynx Lake
  • November 28 - Forest Road 104 Closed For Winter



  • November 17 - Studies Find Danger to Forests without Burning
  • November 25 - Second Class Graduates from Firewise Course
  • October 26 - Forest Health Publication
  • October 25 - Insects, Diseases, and Aboitic Disorders in Southwest Forests
  • October 16 - A Great Learning Tool About Wildfire Management



  • October 3 - Prescott National Forest Survey
  • September 11 - Is Your Home Firewise?
  • August 9 - Flash Flooding
  • June 14 - Firewise Information You Can Use
  • June 17 - How Not To Create Defensible Space



  • May 10—Protecting Your Home From Wildfires
  • May 8—Prescott Forest Restrictions
  • May 5—Fire Restrictions
  • May 3—Ruling on Forests By Susan Gallagher- Associated Press
  • April 24—Don't Leave Home Without Them!



  • April 19—Arizona National Forests Begin State-wide Planning Effort
  • April 18—Fire Safety From Smokey Bear
  • April 12—Treatment To Eradicate Sweet Resinbush Continues
  • April 11—Opening Of A Sherriff's Substation
  • ONGOING: Do You Know What 'Defensible Space' Means?

  • NEWS ADVISORY, DECEMBER 12th - FOREST SERVICE ANNOUNCES SYCAMORE CABIN RENTAL FEE TO INCREASE - Prescott, AZ (December 4, 2006) - Beginning early in 2007, the Prescott National Forest plans to increase the overnight rental fee for historic Sycamore Cabin. Sycamore Cabin, built in 1936, is located on the Verde Ranger District, nine miles east of I-17, along the Dugas Road. The Cabin was once used as a residence for a Forest Service Ranger stationed at the site and is listed on the National Register of Historic Sites. The building is now adapted for use as a rental cabin. For the past 8 years Sycamore Cabin has been a refuge for visitors from around the state. The Cabin is situated on the banks of Sycamore Creek with ready access to hiking, off road vehicle use and wildlife watching. It was one of the cabins featured in an Arizona Highways article (February, 2005) that captured the essence of the Forest Service’s “Rooms With a View” program in which unused buildings on National Forests in Arizona are converted to rental cabins. The rental fees help fund operation and maintenance for the cabins, allowing the building to be preserved while giving visitors a unique recreation experience.

    The current rental fee is $100 per night. The rate will increase to $125 per night. With 2 bedrooms and an indoor bath, Sycamore Cabin sleeps up to 8 people. There is a full kitchen with an electric range and a full size refrigerator, along with a limited amount of cookware and tableware. The cabin has central heating and air conditioning. It also has a wood burning stove in the living room. There is a fully fenced yard. Visitors supply their own towels and bedding.

    Visitors may bring an RV unit to the cabin site and make use of the RV site adjacent to the cabin. The RV site has hookups for electric, water and sewer. If the RV site is used there is an additional $25 per night fee and two additional people are allowed to occupy the cabin site, for a maximum of 10 persons.


    Go to OTHER RECENT STORIES       Go to TOP


    NEWS ADVISORY, DECEMBER 8th - RUTH GREEN OAK PERSONAL USE FUELWOOD PERMITS AVAILABLE - The Prescott National Forest is selling 200 permits for the Ruth Green Oak Sale. The two cord permit will be available for $23.00 ($11.50 per cord). Only Arizona White Oak and Emory Oak may be removed. Permits will be sold on a first-come-first-serve basis and one permit will be allowed per household. Permits will be available starting Monday, December 11, 2006, and will be valid through March 31, 2007. Permits will be available at our Bradshaw Ranger District office located at 344 South Cortez Street in Prescott, Arizona. Office hours are Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. until 4:30 p.m.

    The permitted fuelwood removal area is one mile south of Whitespar Highway, east of Ponderosa Road, and south of Forest Road 64. Township 13 North, Range 2 West, Sections 20 and 29. There are four cutting blocks available totaling 156 acres. This project will aid the fuels reduction effort to protect the community of Prescott. Contact the Prescott National Forest at (928) 443-8000 for further information.


    Go to OTHER RECENT STORIES       Go to TOP


    NEWS ADVISORY, DECEMBER 8th - 100-YEAR OLD GROOM CREEK SCHOOLHOUSE SOUTH OF PRESCOTT AND ANTICIPATES RENTING IT TO THE PUBLIC ON A DAILY BASIS - The Prescott National Forest recently completed renovation of the 100-year old Groom Creek Schoolhouse south of Prescott and anticipates renting it to the public on a daily basis. Beginning in April, 2007, groups will be able to reserve the Schoolhouse building for meetings, receptions, weddings, community gatherings and similar uses.

    The Schoolhouse, built in 1902 and important to the Groom Creek community through the 1950’s, is listed on the National Register of Historic Buildings as a unique example of a two-room schoolhouse from the early 1900’s. The building was acquired by the Forest Service in 1967. However, the building was used very little the past 10 years and was deteriorating from lack of maintenance. A grant from the Forest Service Arizona Cabin Rental program provided funds for restoration. Rental proceeds will now provide funds to manage and maintain the building, plus provide for additional renovation and improvements at the Schoolhouse.

    The building and adjacent picnic area will rent for $150 per day. The Schoolhouse building accommodates groups of 60 people in a meeting or dining room configuration. When the building is used in conjunction with the adjacent picnic area, the facility is suitable for groups of up to 100 persons. The building is furnished with tables and chairs. The picnic area has 9 tables, a fire ring and an amphitheater.

    The Schoolhouse is reached by taking South Mount Vernon Street and the Senator Road south from Prescott for seven miles. The Schoolhouse is located on the east side of Senator Road.

    In April 2007, reservations can be made by contacting the Forest Service National Recreation Reservation Service, ReserveUSA, 1-877-444-6777 or www.reserveusa.com. In addition to the $150 per day rental fee, a $9 service fee will be charged for each reservation. The reservation service also has information about renting and reserving other Forest Service facilities, including those offered under the Arizona Cabin Rental program.


    Go to OTHER RECENT STORIES       Go to TOP


    NEWS ADVISORY, NOVEMBER 30th - BALD EAGLES EXPECTED TO RETURN TO NEST AT LYNX LAKE- A pair of bald eagles successfully raised a pair of young eagles at Lynx Lake last year. In hopes of a fourth successful season, the Prescott National Forest will implement an area closure around the nest area from Friday, December 1, 2006 until June 30, 2007.

    The area closure will include the trail along the east side of the lake, part of the shoreline and part of the surface of the lake. The water surface closure will be marked with buoys. “I am looking forward to a fourth successful nesting season for bald eagles at Lynx Lake,” said Prescott National Forest Wildlife Biologist Noel Fletcher. Forest Service personnel will monitor the bald eagles at Lynx Lake to watch for eagles exhibiting breeding behavior. The winter of 2006/2007 marks the sixth nesting season for the eagles at Lynx Lake. “With three successful years of bald eagles’ nesting at Lynx Lake, including two healthy nestlings last year, the site has proven to be a safe and productive one for the eagles,” said Fletcher. By adhering to the posted closures, visitors can provide the eagles with the best opportunity for another successful nesting season.

    Biologists with the Prescott National Forest have been monitoring wintering bald eagles at Lynx Lake, as well as Goldwater, Watson, and Willow Lakes for the past 12 years. Through the years, bald eagles have been seen at all four lakes during the early January survey. Forest officials may lift the closure before June 30 if the bald eagles do not exhibit breeding and nesting behavior this season.


    Go to OTHER RECENT STORIES       Go to TOP


    NEWS ADVISORY, NOVEMBER 28th- FOREST ROAD 104 CLOSED FOR WINTER - Recreation officials on the Verde Ranger District announced that on Thursday, November 30, Forest Road 104 on Mingus Mountain will be closed for winter. The closure is just past the Forest Road 413 (Allen Springs Road) junction and will prevent vehicle access to Mingus Lake and Mingus Day Use Area. The road will re-open in the spring of 2007 when weather and road conditions are favorable. For more information contact the Verde Ranger District at 928-567-4121.


    Go to OTHER RECENT STORIES       Go to TOP


    NEWS ADVISORY, NOVEMBER 17TH- STUDIES FIND DANGER TO FORESTS IN THINNING WITHOUT BURNING - BY JIM ROBBINS - MISSOULA, Mont. — Thinning forests without also burning accumulated brush and deadwood may increase forest fire damage rather than reduce it, researchers at the Forest Service reported in two recent studies.

    The findings cast doubt on how effective some of the thinning done under President Bush’s Healthy Forests Initiative will be at preventing fires if the forests are not also burned.

    The studies show that in forests that have been thinned but not treated with prescribed burning, tree mortality is much greater than in forests that have had thinning and burning and those that have been left alone. Another study, on Blacks Mountain Experimental Forest in Northern California, had similar findings.

    The studies, combined with other recent research showing that climate change is reducing snowpack and making the fire season longer and more intense, have prompted researchers to urge the Forest Service to use prescribed fire more.

    “We need fire on the ground,” said Dr. Ronald H. Wakimoto, a professor of forestry at the University of Montana who studies fire. “The only thing that stops fires is previous fire or prescribed fire.”

    Sierra Prita Burn

    A study of a 500,000-acre wildfire in Oregon in 2002, called the Biscuit fire, showed that the mortality rate of trees in forests that had neither thinning nor prescribed burns was a little more than half. The study, published in late 2005 in The Canadian Journal of Forest Research, found that 80 to 100 percent of the trees in forests that had only been thinned died in the blaze, while 5 percent of the trees died in forests that had been thinned and burned.

    A 2003 study of another large blaze, the Hayman fire in Colorado in 2002, published as a case study by the Forest Service, showed that fires killed 50 percent of the trees in a natural, unthinned forest but killed 90 percent in a thinned forest, because the fire on the ground was hotter.

    When thick stands of small trees are cleared and space is created between larger trees, it causes a mat of litter several inches thick, including pine needles, slash from thinning and other debris, to dry out. New growth of shrubs and grasses, stimulated by thinning, also adds to the fuel load. When a fire gets started, it burns hotter and moves faster than when it was slowed by thicker growth.

    “The forest floor is hotter, drier and windier,” Dr. Wakimoto said. “When we thin, we’re not getting the shade, and the vegetation doesn’t slow the winds.”

    He said thinning near urban areas was particularly worrisome. “If they don’t treat the fuels on the ground, the fire will get to the homes faster,” he said. Thinning may create room to fight fires, he said, but it creates a false sense of security because serious fires can still happen.

    Thinning is often done to prevent crown fires, which move through treetops, but unless crowns are 20 feet apart, which is usually not the case, surface fires can still create crown fires.

    The most efficient way to decrease these fire risks is with prescribed fire, which can be difficult in areas with houses.

    So-called activity fuels, the debris left by thinning, were a big part of the problem in the Biscuit fire. “Thinning needs to be done completely,” said Crystal L. Raymond, a researcher at the College of Forest Resources at the University of Washington, “including activity fuels, which can be done with prescribed burning.”

    Forests around the West have adapted to frequent fires, which were set by lightning and for centuries by American Indians. But regular, minor fires have been thwarted because of increasing numbers of homes in grasslands and forests. When a fire does start, it feeds on accumulated fuel and is more damaging than smaller, recurring fires would have been.

    Federal officials say they understand the role of prescribed burns but have not used them widely. “It’s an issue of sequence,” said Mark E. Rey, under secretary for natural resources and the environment at the Agriculture Department. “We’ll follow the thinning with prescribed burns.”

    Thinning has been controversial, even when accompanied by prescribed burns, since the Healthy Forests Restoration Act was signed into law in 2003.

    A 1996 federal study, the Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project, was conducted by a team led by Dr. Don C. Erman, emeritus professor of ecology at the University of California, Davis. Dr. Erman said thinning could be effective only if it was repeated as often as every two years, which would be prohibitively expensive. “It’s a treadmill you have to be on all the time,” he said. Prescribed fire may extend the period between thinnings, he said, but not by much.

    Prescribed fire can also be controversial, though for a different reason. A 2000 blaze in New Mexico called the Cerro Grande fire that started as a prescribed fire burned more than 40,000 acres and 400 houses near Los Alamos.

    A report by the Office of the Inspector General at the Agriculture Department issued in March was critical of the Forest Service’s management of the Healthy Forests Initiative, saying the program had no consistent analytical process to determine which areas were most at risk and did not set priorities for projects.

    Mr. Rey said those things had been addressed. “They looked at early treatments,” he said. “Many of the things the inspector general found are things we are aware of and that we’ve moved on to correct.”


    Go to OTHER RECENT STORIES       Go to TOP


    News Advisory, November 15th- SECOND CLASS GRADUATES FROM FIREWISE LANDSCAPER COURSE - The list of graduates of the Wildfire Defensible Landscape Professional course continues to grow. Since last spring when it was first offered, a total of 42 people have successfully completed this intensive 12-hour course offered by the University of Arizona Cooperative Extension in Prescott. Though primarily landscapers, designers and nursery professionals, class members also included a few homeowner association and PAWUIC members as well as two firefighters from Sedona. Current plans are to offer the course twice a year (spring and fall) until the increasing demand for Firewise landscape professionals is fully met.

    Class with Prescott Fire Department

    “The course would not be possible,” says Gene Twaronite, Defensible Educator for Yavapai County Cooperative Extension, “without the help of many PAWUIC members who gave their time freely in sharing their wildfire wisdom and experience with area landscapers. It was a real team teaching effort. I’d like to especially thank my colleague and Extension Agent, Jeff Schalau, for bravely agreeing to have Crystal Taylor-Descheen from Central Yavapai Fire District do an actual risk assessment of his home as part of this class.” According to Twaronite, one of the great things about the last class was the interaction between landscapers and firefighters, which was invaluable to both. Just as landscapers benefited from learning about potential wildfire behavior, firefighters learned how certain landscaping principles and techniques can be applied in creating landscapes that are both wildfire defensible and appealing, thus avoiding potential homeowner misperceptions about defensible space.

    Class with South West Forestry

    Design for the Wildfire Defensible Landscape Professional course was based on an initial survey of area landscape professionals, with input from local firefighters and members of the Prescott Area Wildland Urban Interface Commission. It covers all the basic principles of creating defensible space and fire-resistive landscapes, including local ecology, wildfire history and behavior, and risk assessment, followed by practical, hands-on lessons on defensible space zoning, plant identification, hardscape elements, control of weeds and woody sprouts, proper pruning, compliance with local fire and home association codes and addressing homeowner concerns. “A central focus of the course,” according to Twaronite, “is the risk assessment process, which we want landscapers to thoroughly understand. Creating and maintaining healthy, fire-resistive landscapes must be a year-round task.” In addition to Cooperative Extension staff and volunteers, guest speakers from a wide spectrum of agencies were invited to participate, including the U.S. Forest Service, Arizona State Land Department, Prescott and Central Yavapai Fire Departments, APS, and the Highlands Center for Natural History.

    Landscapers who successfully completed the course received a certificate and are listed in a roster of graduates posted on the University of Arizona Cooperative Extension web site
    Az Cooperative Extension, which homeowners and fire districts can access by going to Firewise/Defensible Space Education and clicking on “Wildfire Defensible Landscape Professional List.” For more information on the next course as well as other training options, call Gene Twaronite at (928) 445-6590 ex. 231 or email him at twaronit@cals.arizona.edu.


    Go to OTHER RECENT STORIES       Go to TOP


    News Advisory, October 26th- FOREST HEALTH PUBLICATION - Please click on the attached link for a great informational publication on bark beetles and find out if your trees are at risk. Forest Health Publication


    Go to OTHER RECENT STORIES       Go to TOP


    News Advisory, October 25th- INSECTS, DISEASES, AND ABIOTIC DISORDERS IN SOUTHWEST FORESTS AND WOODLANDS - Climate Change & Ecosystem Impacts in Southwest Forests and Woodlands, garnered feedback from forest managers regarding opportunities and impediments to applying science-based information to operational management. To read the entire article please click on this link: Arizona Coorperative Extension


    Go to OTHER RECENT STORIES       Go to TOP


    News Advisory, October 16th - A GREAT LEARNING TOOL ABOUT WILDFIRE MANAGEMENT - While searching the web I came across this informative "Living with Fire" tool. This item was found on the National Wildfire Coordinating Group web page; under their Fire Education section. This game is a great learning tool and really gives you a feel for the evaluation process and decisions made during a wildfire. There is also a link for teachers to use this learning tool in the classroom.

    Living with Fire is an educational game that puts you in the place of a Fire Manager, based on research and tools developed for real-world fire management. Recommended for ages 10 and up.

    Take a look and give it a try: Living with Fire.


    Go to OTHER RECENT STORIES       Go to TOP


    News Advisory, October 3 - PRESCOTT NATIONAL FOREST SURVEY COMING YOUR WAY - Soon, you may see more Forest Service and contract employees working in developed and dispersed recreation sites and along Forest Service roads. They will be wearing bright orange vests and be near a sign that says “Traffic Survey Ahead”. Just like the postman these folks may be out in all kinds of adverse weather conditions. These folks are waiting to talk to you, so please pull over for an interview. These well trained interviewers want to know about your visit to the Prescott National Forest. All information you give is confidential and the survey is voluntary.

    This on-going national forest survey has already been conducted once on every National Forest in the country. We are now returning 5 years later to update the information previously gathered as well as to look at recreation trends over time. The information is useful for forest planning and even local community tourism planning. It provides the National Forest managers with an estimate of how many people actually recreate on federal lands and what activities they engage in while there. Other important information forest and tourism planners need includes how satisfied people were with their visit and the economic impact of your recreation visit on the local economy. So many small towns are struggling and they hope that tourism may help strengthen their communities. This is one way to estimate the effects.


    Go to OTHER RECENT STORIES       Go to TOP


    News Advisory, September 11th - IS YOUR HOME FIREWISE? - Take a quiz to determine the fire danger near you. There is no personal information required. Please click on the attached link: Firewise Quiz. Once you have answered each question, hit the submit button, it will tell you the level of fire danger and give you some great helpful hints to become firewise.


    Go to OTHER RECENT STORIES       Go to TOP


    News Advisory, August 9th - Flash Flooding - Floods are the most common and widespread of all weather-related natural disasters. Most communities in the United States have experienced flooding after spring rains, heavy thunderstorms, or winter snow thaws. Flash floods are the most dangerous kind of floods, because they combine the destructive power of a flood with incredible speed and unpredictability.

    Flash floods occur when excessive water fills normally dry creeks or riverbeds along with currently flowing creeks and rivers, causing rapid rises of water in a short amount of time. In mountains, where terrain channels the flow of water, rocky soil or bedrock keeps precipitation from percolating into the ground. Thunderstorm precipitation rates can be high as well over mountainous terrain, so that the combination can lead to flash floods with rainfall of only an inch or two. Flash flooding can become especially likely when a large storm can tap continuous, low-level moisture inflow and is anchored in place for several hours by the topography or weak upper-level winds. Heavy rains from tropical storms and hurricanes can also cause flash flooding. Dam failures can create the worst flash flood events. When a dam or levee breaks, a gigantic quantity of water is suddenly let loose downstream, destroying everything in its path.

    Flash flood waters can move at a very fast speed. They have the power to move boulders, tear out trees, destroy buildings, and obliterate bridges. Walls of water can reach heights of 10 to 20 feet or more, and generally carry a huge amount of debris with them. Flash floods are the number one thunderstorm-related killer in the United States. Nearly half of all flash flood deaths are auto-related.

    The Antelope Canyon Flash Flood of August 12, 1997. On the afternoon of August 12, 1997, 12 people were caught in a narrow canyon near Page, Arizona during a flash flood event. Eleven of these people died when a wall of water, estimated to be well over 10 feet in height, swept through the canyon with little notice. The thunderstorm that caused this flash flood occurred miles from the slot canyon, with only a trace of rain reported at the canyon itself. However, about 10 miles upstream from the canyon 1.5 inches of rainfall fell, with 0.75 inches falling in approximately 15 minutes. The water made it into the canyon approximately 30 to 45 minutes later, with sudden and deadly results. Most flash flood deaths and injuries are preventable if proper precautions.

    SAND BAGS: You may obtain sand bags and sand from Yavapai Co. Public works on 1100 Commerce Drive in Prescott. Also from Verde Valley Roads on Cherry Road and Verde Valley Fire Department.

    Go to OTHER RECENT STORIES       Go to TOP


    June 17 - HOW NOT TO CREATE DEFENSIBLE SPACE —By Gene Twaronite, Defensible Space Educator - University of Arizona Cooperative Extension, Yavapai County - 840 Rodeo Dr. #C, Prescott, AZ 86305 - Phone: 928.445.6590 ext. 231, Fax: 928.445.6593, E-mail: twaronit@ag.arizona.edu

    You’re driving down the road, minding your own business, and there it is: a sign telling you to “create defensible space.” Well, sure, doesn’t everybody? I sometimes wonder, though, what exactly goes through people’s heads when they hear the term “defensible space.” In terms of wildfire, it means reducing or modifying vegetation around the home to reduce the risk of structural fire and give firefighters a chance to do their work.

    But words often have unintended connotations. Doesn’t it sound more like something the military should be doing rather than a homeowner? Images of rigid lines, entrenchments, and sterile horizons come to mind. Surround your home in a ZMD – Zone of Maximum Desolation. Out beyond that line of boulders you will engage the enemy and, if he breaks through your defenses, you will slow him down with gravel and cactus.

    Recently, the term “survivable space” has been added. The idea is to so modify the landscape that a structural fire is unlikely, even without firefighter intervention, for such resources may not always be available. In other words, you’re on your own, baby. Again there’s the military connotation, as in a survivable or winnable war. You’ll just have to survive the holocaust all by yourself.

    Homeowners are implored to cut, trim, and remove all those nasty flammable fuels – otherwise known as trees and shrubs – the very things that attracted them to the wildland urban interface in the first place. The emphasis seems more on the negative. Vegetation reduction and modification. Break up that line of fuel. Get lean, clean and mean. Take it out and get ‘er done. Indeed, since all vegetation is flammable to varying degrees, why take a chance? If a little gravel is good, a lot is better. Gravel doesn’t burn.

    At the conclusion of one of my defensible space programs, during which I had tried to explain about overstocked forests and all the benefits of vegetation management, a woman came over to compliment me on the presentation. “I liked everything except the part about cutting down trees,” she said. In her view there could never be such a thing as too many trees.

    You would think that, with all the programs, conferences and articles on the subject, people would be getting the message by now. For those who live in fire country, creating defensible space should be as natural as breathing. So why do so many wildland houses burn that shouldn’t? Why are there still so many homes that wouldn’t stand a chance in the event of wildfire? And why do firefighters continue to have nightmares each summer about the unthinkable fire in a certain brushchoked neighborhood with poor access and steep slopes?

    No Defensible Space
    A home surrounded by trees and shrubs that doesn’t appear to have defensible space.

    People in the wildfire education business often joke about the need for a really big fire to get folk’s attention. Yes, fear does work wonders, but in the end it only produces short-term behaviors. For a few days or weeks, people will hear the word and be inspired to prune their trees and cut down some brush.

    In their efforts to do something, anything, they will engage in frenetic activity that helps them deal with their fear of fire. In the process they may end up removing too much or the wrong things, even sacrificing that treasured juniper next to the house out of sheer desperation.

    Months later, their reasons for doing these things will be largely forgotten. And the stump sprouts and weeds will reappear and the forest will grow thicker until the next fire comes and the cycle is repeated. This is not the kind of message we need.

    Not that a little healthy respect for fire is unwarranted. Like water, weather, and natural critters, fire is an everpresent part of our environment. It needs to be understood and prepared for, not feared.

    Unfortunately, a century of too rigid fire suppression and the promotion of the idea that all fire is bad will not be easily erased from the public consciousness. Smokey the Bear has succeeded only too well. Though we might wish to eventually restore wildlands to their historic fire return intervals so that less damaging surface fires can safely pass through our communities, changing people’s comfort levels to accept fire as a next door neighbor will most likely take generations to accomplish.

    I think a large part of the problem comes from how we view ourselves in relation to the wildlands we live in. We need to look back on the very reasons that first led us to build our houses there. And we must understand the consequences of our doing so.

    As a defensible space educator, I like to point out that, despite public fears of the big fire coming to town from public land, more fires spread from residential and other developed areas to the wildlands than vice-versa. This implies a major responsibility not only to our families and properties but to the land itself that we as privileged homeowners in this area all share. Recognizing this is the first step toward a more mature relationship to these wildlands.

    I recently participated in a fire risk assessment team composed of members of the Yarnell and Peeples Valley fire departments, the Bureau of Land Management, the Prescott Area Wildland/Urban Interface Commission, and my own institution, the University of Arizona Cooperative Extension.

    As part of a training session, we had been invited to inspect the property of a woman who lived along a riparian corridor that runs through the predominately chaparral vegetation of Peeples Valley. Though we professionals were there to share our observations and recommendations with this woman, she had much to teach us as well.

    Like many residents of fire country, she was new to this wild land and was full of questions and concerns. While hungry for ideas, she proudly shared her accomplishments. She had already devoted hundreds of hours to creating defensible space, and it was obvious to all of us that she really had taken the message to heart.

    But there was still so much more to do, as there always would be. She seemed to relish her role as an active partner with this landscape. Being the owner of five wild acres myself, I shared a laugh with her about the pleasures and challenges of rural land ownership and told her what an inspiration she was.

    For in the long run, hers is the only way to create defensible space that will succeed. She approached her responsibility not out of fear but of love for the land and that which lives on it. She wasn’t just clearing out trees and brush and putting in more gravel.

    She was out there working with nature, removing weeds and ladder fuels that could spread fire not only to her home but to surrounding lands as well, and selectively thinning out trees to improve forest health and wildlife habitat while enhancing the beauty and value of her property. And when the next fire comes, I know she will be ready for it.

    Our knowledge of fire in the landscape is still evolving and so must our vocabulary. Yes, create defensible space. But that woman was doing so much more than that. We need yet a new term. Some recent fire education literature refers to “Living with Fire,” which points us in the right direction. How about “create living space?” That’s what it’s all about, isn’t it? Creating space where all of us – homeowners, neighbors, wildlife, and the land itself – can go on living together in a harmonious relationship with fire.

    For those wishing to discuss this further, please call me or e-mail me at (928) 445-6590 ex. 231 or twaronit@ag.arizona.edu.


    Go to OTHER RECENT STORIES       Go to TOP


    June 14— FIREWISE INFORMATION YOU CAN USE—Attached is a link from the Firewise Communities USA program, with some great ideas and interactive programs that can help you determine if your home is firewise. Please click on this link to learn more:.Interactive programs and more


    Go to OTHER RECENT STORIES       Go to TOP


    News Advisory, May 10, 2006—PROTECTING YOUR HOME FROM WILDFIRES—You have just finished landscaping your yard with trees and shrubs and can’t wait to see them grow and flourish. A year or so goes by and whom do you find knocking at your front door but the Prescott Fire Department or a similar official from the Central Yavapai Fire District.

    They have bad news. All that effort and money you spent has created a high fire danger as your new plants have spread and become a nasty fire hazard, for both to you and your neighbors.

    To learn some simple steps in keeping your yard from becoming a fire hazard and the basics on defensible space, please see PAWUIC’s attached brochure.

    Protecting Your Home From Wildfires

    Go to OTHER RECENT STORIES       Go to TOP


    News Advisory, May 8 — PRESCOTT FOREST RESTRICTIONS — Prescott National Forest will enter into Stage 1 fire restrictions on Thursday, May 11, at 8:00 a.m. “We have reached certain key trigger points that warrant taking these restrictive actions. These include increased forest visitor use, abandoned campfires, spring winds and rising temperatures,” explained Tony Sciacca, Fire Management Officer.

    The following fire restrictions are in effect for the entire Prescott National Forest:

  • Campfires, charcoal grills, and stove fires will be prohibited on all Prescott National Forests lands, roads, and trails. An exception will be to continue to allow these fires in developed fee recreation sites where grills and campfire rings are provided.
  • Pressurized liquid or gas stoves, lanterns and heaters meeting safety specifications are allowed.
  • Smoking is prohibited except within enclosed vehicles, buildings, or developed fee recreation sites where the area is cleared of all flammable material.
  • Campfires are not allowed at the designated dispersed sites within the Prescott Basin. Metal posts identify designated dispersed sites with a number.
  • The restrictions will remain in effect until forest officials determine that conditions have changed sufficiently to reduce the risk of human-caused wildfire.

    Violation of these prohibitions is punishable by a fine of not more than $5,000, imprisonment of not more than 6 months, or both. The public is also reminded that fireworks are always prohibited on all national forest lands.

    For current information on fire restrictions, closures or wildfires on the Prescott National Forest, call 928-777-5799.

    For further information about fire restrictions on public lands in Arizona and New Mexico, call toll free 1-877-864-6985 or visit Fire Restrictions

    Go to OTHER RECENT STORIES       Go to TOP


    News Advisory, May 5 — FIRE RESTRICTIONS — FIRE RESTRICTIONS are in effect on all State Trust Lands within Gila, Maricopa, La Paz, and Yuma Counties effective May 4, 2006. FIRE RESTRICTIONS are in effect on all State Trust Lands within Cochise, Graham, Greenlee, Pima, Pinal, and Santa Cruz Counties effective April 19, 2006.

    Pursuant to the provisions of ARS 37-623, the State Forester has declared the existence of a wildland fire emergency and the State Forester has declared a prohibition on open fires, fireworks, and smoking on ALL State Trust Lands within Cochise, Gila, Graham, Greenlee, La Paz, Maricopa, Pima, Pinal, Santa Cruz, and Yuma Counties.

    The restrictions listed below on fire causing activities will be in effect through July 31, 2006, or until further notice on ALL State Trust Lands within the counties specified above except as specifically permitted by the State Forester on a case-by-case basis.

    Petroleum and LP fueled stoves, lanterns, or heating devices are exempt from these restrictions. These restrictions also apply to all lease and permit holders. Any State, federal, or local fire or law enforcement officer, or member of an organized firefighting force is exempt from these prohibitions while in the performance of their official firefighting duties.

    When restrictions are in effect the following apply:

  • No building, maintaining, or using a fire, campfire, or charcoal burning device, except as specifically permitted by the pertinent agency on a case by case basis. Petroleum fueled stoves, lanterns, or heating devices are exempt from these restrictions.
  • Using fireworks as defined in ARS 36-1601;
  • Smoking, except within an enclosed vehicle, building, developed campground, or while stopped in an area at least 10 feet in diameter that is barren or cleared of all flammable materials.
  • Off road driving is also prohibited (as it always is) on the Trust Lands.
  • For information about permits to legally recreate on State Trust land, please call the Land Department's Public Desk at 602-542-4632.

    Definitions

  • Restrictions: means that an area is open for public use but there are limitations on the kinds of uses in the area (i.e. the types of campfires allowed, smoking only in enclosed vehicles or buildings, etc.).
  • Closures: means prohibiting all public entry to an area, except by area property owners and holders of special use permits.
  • For more information on specific lands, please call toll-free 1-877-864-6985 or Go to the Southwest Area's Fire Operations Prevention Page Fire Restrictions


    Go to OTHER RECENT STORIES       Go to TOP


    News Advisory, May 3,— RULING ON FORESTS By Susan Gallagher, Associated Press Writer HELENA, Mont. - Three rules